Bitcoinocracy - vote with your Bitcoin signature

Bitcoinocracy offers free and transparent voting mechanism to facilitate decentralized decision making in the Bitcoin ecosystem and to determine the truth backed by real monetary value.
Submit your Argument or check the existing ones:
-12151.82126475Ƀ
BIP101 is better than the status quo
-11892.95528637Ƀ
In the event of a fork, I will sell RBF BlockStream Core Coins and buy Classic Bitcoins
4265.98326654Ƀ
Moderation policy by Theymos removes distractions by poor trolls.
5218.92697654Ƀ
The status quo is better than BIP101.
-10148.07040875Ƀ
Block size limit should be increased to 8 mb as soon as possible
163.37128603Ƀ
A one-time increase to 8 MB would be better right now than 4 MB
5357.77695294Ƀ
Bitcoin's should not adopt hard-forks except with the widest possible support.
-5083.95283949Ƀ
BIP 101 is the implemented and tested solution that gives Bitcoin a chance to scale with respect to the long term technological trends (and can be fixed without a new hard fork if they discontinue).
5981.17049722Ƀ
Unlimited blocksize is bad for Bitcoin because it diminishes incentive to pay fees and in the long term it makes mining unprofitable.
-398.98069628Ƀ
Wide consensus doesn't mean anything if it was achieved by censorship
-4791.80384840Ƀ
RBF (Replace-By-Fee) policy should NOT be adopted because it breaks 0-conf transactions and needlessly imposes extra development costs on existing merchants
4880.70278746Ƀ
BIP100, BIP101, BIP102, and BIP103 increase scale without increasing scalablity, potentially a cost to security.
-5047.00168323Ƀ
BIP101 is better than BIP100
2799.53907241Ƀ
Bitcoin's value depends critically on censorship resistance, monetary sovereignty, and the personal control made possible by decentralisation.
2297.76023663Ƀ
Armory is the safest and most secure way to vote on Bitcoinocracy.
-4231.27030897Ƀ
A one-time increase would be better right now than nothing
-4236.60914525Ƀ
A one-time increase to 4 MB would be better right now than 3 MB
4237.12052889Ƀ
Segregated Witness is a good short-term approach to scaling Bitcoin capacity
22636.41154651Ƀ
If non-Core hard fork wins, major holders will sell BTC, driving price into the ground
148.14828948Ƀ
A one-time increase to 3 MB would be better right now than 2 MB
-69.01644619Ƀ
the block size limit should not be increased in the near future [except possibly via segregated witness]
-5813.60870555Ƀ
I will choose Bitcoin Classic (2MB) over Bitcoin Core (1MB) in the coming fork.
-4399.98043128Ƀ
The block size limit should be constrained ONLY by technology (that grows exponentially)
492.35170628Ƀ
Fungibility is a more pressing problem than scale for Bitcoin.
-4399.98043128Ƀ
Bitcoin Core should be renamed to Lightning Core to better reflect it's soon to be USP